The
narrative of this music video is a love story; this is helps to back up Tim O Sullivan’s
theory that all media tell us some sort of story.
When looking at Kate Domillies theory which states that every story can be
filtered into one of the eight narrative categories: This video falls into the
Tristan and issault narrative of a ‘love triangle’. (Through careful mediation,
media texts offer a way of telling stories about ourselves – not usually our
own personal stories, but the story of us as a culture or set of cultures.)
This Narrative follows Todorov theory of the equilibrium of diegesis as the
female actor is the protagonist and the male is the antagonist, the disruption
is the male cheating this leads to the females ‘quest’ to destroy his property.
Finally leading to him returning home and her acting as if nothing had been
done, this then starts again like (Groundhog Day).
When
watching this video the theory from Bordwell and
Thompson (1997) states that it offers two distinctions between stories and
plot which relate to the diegetic world of the narrative that the audience
are positioned to accept and that which the audience actually see. This is
seen in the fact that this is presented to us as an audience in parts, the
start of this piece shows the protagonist and antagonist kissing, and this is
then shown at the end which shows us as audience a chance to establish he
beginning and the end. The video is made through cross cutting showing the two
sides to the story, one being the male
being ‘bad’ due to cheating and the female being ‘good’ by staying loyal as
well as the male being ‘happy’ and the female being ‘sad’ this is stated in
Claude Lévi-Strauss (1958) Theory: which
states that ideas about narrative amount
to the fact that he believed all stories operated to certain clear binary
opposites such as ‘good vs bad’, ‘right and wrong’ , there is no in between.
This is shown through this music video as the male is doing wrong where as she
is doing right.
The
use of mise-en-scene within this video is shown when the Male actor is wearing
black which connotes bad whereas the female is wearing white which connotes innocents,
this is how the institution have tried to imply the story to us as an audience, in which this is how we
understand Claude Lévi-Strauss (1958)
Theory. Another use of mise-en-scene is the fact that the female who the male
is cheating with, is also dressed in black again adding to how we are shown the
characters within the story.
Within this as well the use of Laura Mulveys male gaze theory is shown through
the female who the male is cheating with, she is see with very little clothing
on as well as none at all, this is a way to attract a male audience and helps
to build on stereotypes though Tessa Perkins Theory as the women involved in
the cheating is shown as a more sexual object and more provocative than the
wife of the male.
No comments:
Post a Comment